How does re-integrative shaming differ from disintegrative shaming?

Re-integrative shaming is characterized by its focus on avoiding the stigmatization of the individual who has committed an offense. This approach emphasizes the distinction between the person's behavior and their identity, meaning that while the act of wrongdoing is condemned, the person is not labeled as a deviant or criminal for life. Instead, the goal is to reintegrate the individual back into society, promoting social bonds and support structures that can help prevent future deviance.

In contrast, disintegrative shaming leads to a more permanent stigmatization of the individual, potentially resulting in social exclusion and a loss of community ties. This method can isolate the individual and increase the risk of further deviance, as it does not provide the support or opportunity for rehabilitation that re-integrative shaming does. Therefore, re-integrative shaming is seen as a more constructive approach that seeks to mend social ties while addressing the harmful behavior.