What is a criticism of the functionalist sex role theory mentioned by Walklate 2003?

The criticism of the functionalist sex role theory highlighted by Walklate in 2003 focuses on the idea that the theory overemphasizes biological differences between genders. This concept suggests that functionalism tends to attribute certain behaviors and roles within society primarily to inherent biological traits, rather than recognizing the significant influence of socialization and cultural context.

By placing too much emphasis on biology, functionalist sex role theory risks oversimplifying the complex nature of gender roles and does not account for the social and environmental factors that shape individuals' behaviors and roles in society. This stance can lead to a deterministic view of gender, which overlooks the ways in which social structures and interactions contribute to the development of gender identities and roles. Walklate's critique encourages a reevaluation of the functionalist perspective, urging scholars to consider a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between biology and socialization in the formation of gender roles.