What is one form of double standards in the legal treatment of genders according to Sharpe 2009?

The observation that girls receive harsher punishment for sexual promiscuity than boys highlights a significant aspect of gender inequality in the legal system. This reflects a societal double standard where girls are often judged more harshly for engaging in the same behaviors that may not attract the same level of condemnation for boys.

This harsher treatment of girls may stem from traditional gender norms that view female sexuality as something that should be more controlled or limited compared to male sexuality. The implications of this double standard can reinforce damaging stereotypes and perpetuate inequality, as girls may face social stigma and legal repercussions that boys do not.

The other choices do not reflect the same dynamics of gender treatment in legal contexts. For instance, boys being punished for sexual activity does not illustrate a double standard but rather acknowledges that all genders can face consequences for their actions. Similarly, the idea that boys are encouraged to be sexually active reinforces the expectation of male sexual freedom, which contrasts with the punitive measures against female promiscuity. Lastly, courts ignoring female offenders' sexual activities also does not illustrate a direct comparison of differential treatment; it may imply neglect rather than a punitive bias.