Which of the following is NOT a criticism of zero tolerance policing?

The assertion that encouraging community engagement and support is not a criticism of zero tolerance policing is accurate because this aspect is often seen as a positive outcome of the approach. Proponents of zero tolerance policing argue that it aims to foster a sense of safety and community order, which can lead to greater public cooperation and engagement with law enforcement. By addressing minor offenses, officers may encourage community members to become more involved in local issues and support policing efforts. This potential for strengthening community ties is frequently highlighted by advocates who believe that a police presence can deter crime and build trust within the community.

In contrast, the other options reflect criticisms that have emerged regarding zero tolerance policing. The focus on minor offenses can lead to an overwhelming number of arrests for behaviors that may not significantly impact public safety. Disproportionately affecting marginalized groups is another significant concern, as these communities often bear the brunt of strict enforcement policies. Moreover, neglecting corporate crime issues points to a limitation in zero tolerance policing, as it often prioritizes street-level offenses while overlooking more complex, systemic crimes that can have widespread social repercussions. Overall, the engagement and support aspect is viewed favorably, distinguishing it from the critiques that surround this policing strategy.